President Nixon and the kitchen-table debates

Richard M. Nixon

Richard M. Nixon

Today would have been the 100th birthday of Richard M. Nixon, 37th president of the United States

This news has been widely reported, so I’m sure you already know. But his death offers an opportunity to share the obituary Hunter S. Thompson wrote for The Atlantic when Nixon died in 1994 at age 81:

It was Richard Nixon who got me into politics, and now that he’s gone, I feel lonely. He was a giant in his way. As long as Nixon was politically alive — and he was, all the way to the end — we could always be sure of finding the enemy on the Low Road. There was no need to look anywhere else for the evil bastard. He had the fighting instincts of a badger trapped by hounds. The badger will roll over on its back and emit a smell of death, which confuses the dogs and lures them in for the traditional ripping and tearing action. But it is usually the badger who does the ripping and tearing. It is a beast that fights best on its back: rolling under the throat of the enemy and seizing it by the head with all four claws.

That was Nixon’s style — and if you forgot, he would kill you as a lesson to the others. Badgers don’t fight fair, bubba. That’s why God made dachshunds.

Hunter S. Thompson

Hunter S. Thompson

Thompson, noted for writing Fear and Loathing on the Campaign Trail ’72, committed suicide in 2005 at the age of 67. And he most likely had at least as many detractors as Nixon had.

It wasn’t until later in life that I became familiar with Thompson and his gonzo journalism.

But my some of my earliest memories of politics involve Nixon. My mom and dad were 29 and 33, respectively, on June 17, 1972, when the Watergate burglars broke into the Democratic party headquarters. It’s safe to say my parents were not Nixon fans, especially Mom, who had grown up in Lucas, Iowa, the home of famed labor organizer John L. Lewis, who died in 1969 at age 89.

Nixon won re-election on Nov. 7, 1972, defeating Sen. George McGovern of South Dakota in a landslide. This was four days after my sixth birthday, so it would have been nearly impossible for my parents’ feelings about Nixon to have not left an impression. And searing it into my memory was the fact that my paternal grandparents, whose farmhouse was a few hundred feet from the house in which I grew up, were Nixon people. This undoubtedly added to the tension that was probably already beginning to develop even then between my parents and paternal grandparents — later straining to a point that would take far too long to detail today. You’ll have to read the book if I ever get around to writing it.

Anyway, I can remember my grandpa reading the Des Moines Register at our house, the adults talking about the Watergate scandal and my parents — later, after my grandparents had gone home — wondering how anyone could support Nixon … especially in the days surrounding his resignation in 1974. I don’t know if either of my parents ever voted for a Republican presidential candidate prior to Nixon, but I’d be very surprised to learn they had in the past 39 years. And I don’t suppose my family is unique in how it may have been shaped by Nixon.

His death is worth remembering here if only so that it might help make sure someone like him is never again elected to be president of the United States. And it’s a good reminder that if the United States could survive the damage Nixon wrought, it can survive any of the challenges it faces today.

Is anyone out there? Anyone? Please speak up

ben-stein-ferris-buellers-day-offThe worst teachers stand in the front of a classroom or lecture hall and drone on from the time their classes begin until they end.

Communication in these classrooms is mostly one-way.

chariton-high-school-1The teacher talks and talks and talks and talks. Students in the classroom listen or take notes. Or, speaking from personal experience, they sometimes sleep. This is what I did in high school for an entire semester of seventh-hour U.S. government.

And that brings me to this blog and the conversation it doesn’t ignite. So far, the dialogue has been generated mostly by me. That may not be a good thing.

Tuesday, on the other hand, was actually a better day. Of the 103 people who read the blog by Tuesday evening, five posted comments. I responded three times, raising the day’s total number of comments to eight.

Also, a total of 11 readers voted in a poll posted on the blog Tuesday.

Nancy Nall Derringer

Nancy Nall Derringer

This is something I’d like to change at Brome Hill. A blog I read nearly every day is written by Nancy Nall Derringer, a former newspaper columnist who lives in Michigan. Granted, she has been blogging for quite a bit longer than I have been. And she’s a better writer than I am to boot. But on a daily basis,  Derringer and her readers have a great dialogue. They discuss. They debate. On days when she is busy, she simply opens a thread and turns them loose to carry the conversation on that particular day.

I see similar things going on at some of the WordPress blogs I have started to follow.

Wouldn’t it be great to have that kind of community here? Or maybe I’m the only one who thinks so.

It seems to me this blog could become a great place for people to chat. It’s read by quite a few Muscatine residents, along with a growing number of WordPress bloggers and many of the friends I’ve made going back to my grade-school days. Readers have come here via word of mouth, their Facebook pages and Twitter feeds and via Google and other Internet search engines. The readers I know are as far-flung as Finland and Oregon. They are both politically conservative and liberal.

Just imagine what we could learn from one another if more of them joined me in what has been largely a one-way dialogue up to this point.

Speaking of Nancynall.com: There were a couple of links posted Tuesday on this blog that are worth your time. I often wonder how she finds this stuff.

The first link was a great commentary on Lance Armstrong. Nall Derringer called it the best column she has read about Armstrong in a good long time. For what it’s worth, I agree.

The second link is from the TV show, Myth Busters. It’s far more interesting than was the movie on which it was based.

Following up on The Dish

220px-Andrew_Sullivan_croppedAndrew Sullivan says, according to several reports, that his readers ponied up more than $100,000 Wednesday in the first six hours that he sold subscriptions to The Dish, the blog he is separating from The Daily Beast.

More power to him, I say. But at Time magazine offers perspective with which I agree.

For what it’s worth, one of the writers whose blog I would pay to read — and I wonder if he’s paying attention to Sullivan — is Charles Pierce and his Politics Blog at esquire.com. To my way of thinking, he is way more entertaining than Sullivan.

The best gift I received this Christmas

PosterFor Christmas, all I asked for was some art to put in my still-new office at MCSA.

This framed poster is what my wife, Nancy, got me. The poster says:

“What we would like to do is change the world…

By crying out
unceasingly
for the rights
of the workers,
of the poor,
of the destitute…
We can throw our
pebble in the pond
and be confident that
its ever widening circle
will reach around the world.”

The image is of Dorothy Day, who helped establish the Catholic Worker movement in New York in the 1930s. The quote is a paraphrase of a longer quote from Love Is The Measure, an essay Day wrote for The Catholic Worker in June 1946.

Given that my new job is at the homeless shelter in Muscatine, where I am now deputy director, the quote used for this poster seems just about perfect for my office.

The poster is a great gift.